Webster Eisenlohr, Inc. v. Kalodner
United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
145 F.2d 316 (1944)
Andrew Speese sued his company, Webster Eisenlohr, Inc. (Webster) (plaintiff), on behalf of the company’s preferred stockholders. The dispute in the case was whether, under Webster’s certificate of incorporation, the preferred stockholders had exclusive voting power or only the power to vote along with the common stock under given circumstances. After Speese brought suit, Webster sent a financial report to its stockholders, and wrote a letter to its preferred stockholders offering to purchase their interests. As a result, some of the preferred stockholders disposed of their shares. Harry Kalodner (defendant) was one of the judges of the United States District Court for the Northern Eastern District of Pennsylvania who heard Speese’s case against Webster. Kalodner received copies of the financial report and letter. He believed that the financial report was misleading, and that the letter failed to disclose material facts. Speese did not question the truth of the financial report, or the reliability of the letter. Nevertheless, Kalodner appointed a special master, under Rule 53 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (the Rules), to investigate the financial report and letter. Webster then brought this action against Kalodner, seeking a vacation of Kalodner’s order, a writ of mandamus directing the district court to vacate the appointment of the special master, and a writ of prohibition directed to the special master to prevent him from carrying out Kalodner’s order.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Goodrich, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 176,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.