Webster v. Doe
United States Supreme Court
486 U.S. 592 (1988)
- Written by Kathryn Lohmeyer, JD
Facts
John Doe (plaintiff) began working for the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) in 1973. Over the course of his time at the CIA, Doe received excellent reviews and a promotion. In 1982, he informed a CIA security officer that he was gay. The Director of the CIA (Director) (defendant) then fired Doe on the ground that his homosexuality posed a threat to security. Doe sued the Director, arguing that the agency’s decision to fire him violated the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) and deprived him of his constitutionally protected rights to property, liberty, and privacy; procedural due process; and equal protection. In response to Doe’s suit, the Director argued that § 102(c) of the National Security Act (NSA) precludes judicial review of his dismissal decisions. Section 102 provides that an agency employee may be terminated if the Director "shall deem such termination necessary or advisable in the interests of the United States." The appellate court found that Doe’s termination was reviewable. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Rehnquist, C.J.)
Concurrence/Dissent (O'Connor, J.)
Dissent (Scalia, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.