Webster v. Town of Canada

778 A.2d 402 (2001)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Webster v. Town of Canada

New Hampshire Supreme Court
778 A.2d 402 (2001)

  • Written by Robert Cane, JD

Facts

A New Hampshire state statute (the scenic-road statute) provided local planning boards with the power to designate roads as scenic and to regulate the removal of trees on designated scenic roads. The Town of Canada Planning Board (board) (defendant) voted to designate Libbee Road as a scenic road under the scenic-road statute. The board found that the designation of Libbee Road as a scenic road protected and enhanced the scenic beauty of the town. Kenneth Webster, Margaret Demos, Winthrop Sargent, and Julee Sanderson (the developers) (plaintiffs) sought permission from the board to remove trees from Libbee Road. The board denied the applications of the developers, who then appealed the denials by the board to the superior court, which affirmed the board’s decisions. The developers appealed again, arguing the concept of scenic beauty was impermissibly vague.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Dalianis, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership