From our private database of 35,400+ case briefs...
Weeks v. Angelone
United States Supreme Court
528 U.S. 225, 120 S. Ct. 727, 145 L. Ed. 2d 727 (2000)
Facts
Lonnie Weeks, Jr., (defendant) shot and killed a Virginia state trooper. A jury found Weeks guilty of capital murder. The trial proceeded to the penalty phase. The state sought to prove two aggravating circumstances: that Weeks posed a threat of future dangerousness and that his offense was outrageously vile or inhuman. During the jury’s deliberations regarding which punishment to impose, the jury asked whether Weeks would have the possibility of parole if given a sentence of life imprisonment. The judge gave a vague answer that did not answer the jury’s question directly. Defense counsel objected to the judge’s response. Later that day, the jury asked another question seeking clarification of their duty. The jury asked whether it was required to impose a death sentence if it found at least one of the aggravating factors to be proved. The judge merely referred the jury to a specific paragraph of the jury instructions. Defense counsel disagreed with the judge’s response again and asked for an instruction clarifying that the jury may impose a life sentence even if they found one of the factors to be proved beyond a reasonable doubt. The jury deliberated for two more hours before returning a verdict sentencing Weeks to death. Weeks sought habeas corpus relief, which was denied. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Rehnquist, C.J.)
Dissent (Stevens, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 617,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 35,400 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
