Weeks v. Angelone

528 U.S. 225, 120 S. Ct. 727, 145 L. Ed. 2d 727 (2000)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Weeks v. Angelone

United States Supreme Court
528 U.S. 225, 120 S. Ct. 727, 145 L. Ed. 2d 727 (2000)

  • Written by Robert Cane, JD

Facts

Lonnie Weeks, Jr., (defendant) shot and killed a Virginia state trooper. A jury found Weeks guilty of capital murder. The trial proceeded to the penalty phase. The state sought to prove two aggravating circumstances: that Weeks posed a threat of future dangerousness and that his offense was outrageously vile or inhuman. During the jury’s deliberations regarding which punishment to impose, the jury asked whether Weeks would have the possibility of parole if given a sentence of life imprisonment. The judge gave a vague answer that did not answer the jury’s question directly. Defense counsel objected to the judge’s response. Later that day, the jury asked another question seeking clarification of their duty. The jury asked whether it was required to impose a death sentence if it found at least one of the aggravating factors to be proved. The judge merely referred the jury to a specific paragraph of the jury instructions. Defense counsel disagreed with the judge’s response again and asked for an instruction clarifying that the jury may impose a life sentence even if they found one of the factors to be proved beyond a reasonable doubt. The jury deliberated for two more hours before returning a verdict sentencing Weeks to death. Weeks sought habeas corpus relief, which was denied. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Rehnquist, C.J.)

Dissent (Stevens, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership