United States Supreme Court
422 U.S. 749 (1975)
A federal insurance law required that the surviving wife and stepchildren of a deceased wage earner must have had a relationship with the deceased for at least nine months prior to his death to be able to recover insurance benefits (a.k.a. the duration-of-relationship requirement). Salfi’s (plaintiff) husband died six months after they were married, despite being in good health when they got married. She applied for insurance benefits for herself and on behalf of her daughter from a previous marriage. The Social Security Administration (SSA) (defendant) denied her claims based on the duration-of-relationship requirement and did not afford her a chance to present evidence that her marriage was legitimate. Salfi brought suit and the district court ruled in her favor, invalidating the duration-of-relationship requirement. The district court ruled that the duration-of-relationship requirement improperly created an irrebuttable presumption that short-term marriages such as Salfi’s were entered into in order to take advantage of the social security system. The SSA appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Rehnquist, J.)
Dissent (Douglas, J.)
Dissent (Brennan, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.