Logourl black

Weisgram v. Marley Co.

United States Supreme Court
528 U.S. 440 (2000)


On December 30, 1993, Bonnie Weisgram’s home caught fire. When firefighters arrived at the scene, they found Bonnie dead from carbon monoxide poisoning. Her son, Chad Weisgram (plaintiff), brought a products liability suit against the manufacturer of the heated baseboards in Bonnie’s house, Marley Co. (defendant), alleging that a defect in the electric baseboards caused the fire that killed Bonnie. At trial, Weisgram presented evidence from three experts, who testified that the heater contained a defect that caused the heater to overheat and catch fire. Marley objected to this testimony, arguing that it was unreliable and therefore inadmissible under F.R.E. 702 and the standard set forth by the Court in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, 509 U.S. 579 (1993). The trial court overruled the objection and denied both of Marley’s motions for a judgment as a matter of law under F.R.C.P. 50. The jury returned a verdict in favor of Weisgram, and Marley appealed. The court of appeals reversed, finding that Weisgram’s experts’ testimony was inadmissible because it was speculative and not scientifically sound, and without that testimony Weisgram had not presented enough evidence to sustain the jury verdict. Weisgram appealed, and the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.


The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Ginsburg, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Here's why 93,000 law students rely on our case briefs:

  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners not other law students.
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet.
  • 12,592 briefs - keyed to 169 casebooks.
  • Uniform format for every case brief.
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language.
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions.
  • Ability to tag case briefs in an outlining tool.
  • Top-notch customer support.
Start Your Free Trial Now