Weiss v. Commissioner

129 T.C. 175, 129 T.C. No. 18 (2007)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Weiss v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court
129 T.C. 175, 129 T.C. No. 18 (2007)

JC

Facts

Tobias and Gertrude Weiss (plaintiffs) reported $24,376 of qualified dividends on their 2005 income-tax return. However, the Weisses did not include those dividends within their taxable income. Instead, the Weisses purported to separately compute a 15 percent tax of $3,656 on the dividends and added that figure to the computed $68,609 of tax on the Weisses’ taxable income. However, the Commissioner of Internal Revenue (the commissioner) (defendant) found this calculation to be a math error and, after fixing several errors, found that the Weisses had taxable income of $315,532 and thus had a deficiency of $6,073. The Weisses filed suit, alleging they had correctly calculated the dividends and paid the appropriate tax. The government countered by arguing that the dividends should have been included in the Weisses’ taxable income, which would then have been used to figure the Weisses’ alternative minimum tax, as dividends are included within the gross income that is also included within taxable income.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Thornton, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership