Weiss v. Smulders
Connecticut Supreme Court
96 A.3d 1175 (2014)
Randall Weiss (plaintiff) and Michael Smulders (defendant) signed a distribution agreement under which Weiss’s company was the exclusive distributor of granola produced by Smulders’s company. The distribution agreement referenced in the recital provisions a potential merger that the parties had discussed. The agreement stated, however, that any such merger would need to be reduced to writing in a separate document. The agreement also contained a merger clause stating that the agreement included all terms agreed to “with reference to the subject matter hereof.” After the execution of the agreement, Smulders orally promised Weiss that he would agree to the merger. Weiss wound down his olive oil business to focus on the granola business and spent significant time and money on the granola business in preparation for the merger. Subsequently, Smulders informed Weiss that he no longer wanted to go through with the merger. Weiss brought suit based on the doctrine of promissory estoppel. Smulders argued that the distribution agreement was fully integrated and that the parol evidence rule prohibited the court from considering Smulders’s oral representations about the merger. The trial court found in favor of Weiss on the promissory estoppel claim. Smulders appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (McDonald, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 724,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 724,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,500 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.