Weiss v. Weiss
New York Supreme Court
29 Misc. 3d 1202(A), 958 N.Y.S.2d 311 (Table), 2010 WL 3781286, 2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 51671(U) (2010)
- Written by Mary Katherine Cunningham, JD
Facts
Bruce Weiss (defendant) and Elizabeth Weiss (plaintiff) were married in April 1986 and separated several years before Elizabeth filed for divorce. In May 2008, Bruce commenced a suit for divorce in Clark County, Nevada, with a complaint that stated Bruce was a bona fide domiciliary in Nevada for six weeks before the filing of the suit. In June 2008, Elizabeth found copies of Bruce’s summons and complaint taped to her door in Brooklyn, New York. In August 2008, the court in Nevada granted Bruce a final decree of divorce. In September 2008, Elizabeth filed a complaint seeking a declaration that the Nevada decree of divorce was invalid. Elizabeth asserted in her complaint that Bruce was not a bona fide domiciliary of Nevada and did not meet the requirements for divorce decree in Nevada. Elizabeth further asserted that Bruce was still living and working in New York during the relevant six weeks before Bruce filed the divorce action in Nevada. Elizabeth furthermore asserted a controversy exists about whether she and Bruce are husband and wife and about how the couples’ assets should be divided. Issue was joined in October 2006, and Bruce filed an answer denying Elizabeth’s contention. Bruce made a motion for an order dismissing Elizabeth’s complaint for lack of jurisdiction or, in the alternative, changing the venue of the suit to Clark County, Nevada.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Sunshine, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 824,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.