Welch v. Carson Productions Group, Ltd.

791 F.2d 13 (1986)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Welch v. Carson Productions Group, Ltd.

United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
791 F.2d 13 (1986)

SH

Facts

Charles Welch (plaintiff) was a professional actor who appeared in a 1967 commercial entitled “Disadvantages” for Benson & Hedges cigarettes and in a 1972 commercial entitled “Tap Dancer” for United Airlines. In 1982, Carson Productions Group, Ltd. (defendant) began production of a television program entitled Television’s Greatest Commercial—Part II that was designed to feature a collection of well-known commercials, including “Disadvantages” and “Tap Dancer.” In accordance with Section 36 of the 1977 Screen Actors Guild (SAG) Television Agreement (Green Book), Carson attempted to identify Welch in order to obtain his consent and negotiate compensation for the reuse of the commercials and contacted SAG when it was unable to do so. Only after SAG itself was also unable to identify Welch did Carson use the footage, as permitted by the Green Book. Following the program’s broadcast, Welch brought suit against Carson, alleging that the reuse of the commercials without his written consent violated Sections 50 and 51 of the New York Civil Rights Law. The district court ruled in favor of Carson. Welch appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Miner, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership