Welch v. Kosasky

509 N.E.2d 919 (1987)

From our private database of 46,100+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Welch v. Kosasky

Massachusetts Court of Appeals
509 N.E.2d 919 (1987)

SC

Facts

In 1974, the Welches (plaintiffs) had 12 lots of silver antiques stolen from their home. The lots ended up in a pawn shop, and Kosasky (defendant) bought some of the silver and sold it to an antiques dealer. The dealer recommended, and Kosasky agreed, that one of the lots, a set of castors, should be altered to restore it to what the dealer believed was its original condition. The alterations were carried out, and the castors were put up for sale. In 1981, Mrs. Welch saw some of her stolen goods for sale in the window of a Boston antiques dealer. By 1982, the Welches were able to track down and recover all of their stolen silver. The Welches sued Kosasky for conversion of the silver and for damages due to the alteration of the castors. At trial it was established that the Welches had purchased the castors for $7,500 in 1971. An expert witness for the Welches testified that the castors, if unaltered, would have been worth at least $25,000 in 1984. The witness testified that the castors, as altered, were worth $3,000. The trial court held that Kosasky knew or should have known that the pawn shop dealt in stolen goods. The trial court awarded $10,000 in damages for the Welches’ loss of the use of silver for the 8-year period in which they were stolen; $22,000 in damages for the decrease in the value of the castors due to the alterations (i.e., $25,000 - $3,000); and $5,000 in consequential damages for costs incurred in finding and recovering all 12 lots. Kosasky appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Armstrong, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 748,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 748,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,100 briefs, keyed to 987 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 748,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,100 briefs - keyed to 987 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership