Welco Industries, Inc. v. Applied Companies
Ohio Supreme Court
617 N.E.2d 1129 (1993)
- Written by Robert Cane, JD
Facts
Vickers, Inc. (defendant) purchased assets from Welco Industries. Inc. (Welco) (plaintiff) and its parent company for about $8.3 million. The assets included the Welco name, plant, machinery, inventory, patents, and goodwill. Vickers explicitly did not assume any liabilities that Welco owed to Applied Companies, Inc. (Applied) (defendant) under specific contracts. However, Vickers did assume some of Welco’s other liabilities unrelated to Applied. Vickers continued on Welco’s line of business as Vickers-Welco. Welco changed its name to Wesche Electric. Welco sued Applied for breach of contract prior to the sale to Vickers. Sometime after the sale, Applied filed a counterclaim against Welco for breach of contract and added Vickers as a counterclaim defendant under a successor-liability theory that Vickers-Welco was a mere continuation of Welco. The trial court granted summary judgment for Vickers. The appellate court reversed the judgment of the trial court. Vickers appealed to the Ohio Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Moyer, C.J.)
Dissent (Sweeney, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.