Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Weser v. PGA

United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
1979—2 Trade Cases (CCH) 78,180


Facts

Emil Weser (plaintiff) wanted to play in the Western Open, a golf tournament co-sponsored by the Professional Golfers Association of America (PGA) (defendant). Weser did not meet any of the PGA’s eligibility criteria to enter. The primary means of becoming eligible was by successful completion of PGA qualifying school. The number of players who were able to successfully complete qualifying school each year was tied to the number of openings on the PGA tour. In addition, PGA regulations outlined nine other categories of golfers who were eligible to play in a PGA tournament, including the 25 lowest-scoring golfers at the PGA Championship tournament, winners of certain other tournaments, and PGA section champions. Weser brought suit, claiming the eligibility requirements for the tournament violated antitrust laws. PGA filed a motion to dismiss. PGA’s stated goal of its eligibility requirements was to foster a high level of competition on its tour. PGA argued that the number of players in each tournament was limited due to the size of golf courses, the time it took each player to play a round of golf, and other factors such as the availability of private courses and tournament volunteers.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Marshall, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 222,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.