Wessels v. Wessels
Iowa Supreme Court
542 N.W.2d 486 (1995)
- Written by Brittany Frankel, JD
Facts
James Wessels (defendant) and Yvonne Wessels (plaintiff) were married for 21 years. In the early years of the Wesselses’ marriage, Yvonne worked as a nurse, while James completed medical school. The couple later had two children, and Yvonne became a homemaker, while James served as the breadwinner. Over time, the marriage deteriorated, and the couple divorced. The Wesselses stipulated that James would pay $3,100 per month in rehabilitative alimony for a period of 60 months. As a condition of the award, Yvonne was to make every effort to become self-sufficient. In the years following the couple's divorce, Yvonne's mental state deteriorated. Yvonne suffered from post-traumatic stress disorder and major depression. Although Yvonne made multiple efforts to become employed, she was unable to maintain employment due to her psychiatric state. One month before the rehabilitative alimony was set to expire, Yvonne filed a petition to modify the divorce decree and extend the rehabilitative alimony award or convert it to a permanent award. Following a trial, the district court found that due to unforeseen changed circumstances, it was appropriate to modify the decree and convert Yvonne's award to a permanent-alimony award. James filed an appeal and alleged that the trial court exceeded its authority, because a rehabilitative-alimony award cannot be converted into a permanent-alimony award.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Harris, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.