West Coast Marketing Corp. v. Commissioner
United States Tax Court
46 T.C. 32 (1966)
- Written by Eric Miller, JD
Facts
Max Cohen was the sole stockholder in and president of West Coast Marketing Corporation (plaintiff). Cohen purchased 12,000 acres of land, which was divided into north, middle, and south tracts. Cohen assigned his interest in the middle tract to West Coast Marketing. Cohen and West Coast Marketing sold one-half of their interests to George Coury. With Cohen’s encouragement, Coury sought to sell the land. Coury negotiated a deal with Louis Wolfen, who was the largest stockholder in Universal Marion Corp. (Universal). Universal executed a formal offer letter to purchase all three tracts for $360 per acre, payable in Universal preferred stock. Coury, Cohen, and West Coast Marketing orally agreed. However, before the sale itself was executed, Cohen formed Manatee Land Co. (Manatee) as a conduit for passing title to Universal. Cohen and West Coast Marketing transferred their interests in the three tracts to Manatee for 769 shares and 645 shares of Manatee stock, respectively. When the sale agreement was executed, Manatee transferred title to Universal, and Cohen and West Coast Marketing transferred their Manatee stock to Universal in exchange for 10,800 shares of Universal’s voting stock. Manatee was then liquidated by Universal. West Coast Marketing reported no taxable income from the transaction. However, the Commissioner of Internal Revenue (the commissioner) (defendant) determined that West Coast Marketing had realized a long-term capital gain on the exchange of Manatee stock for Universal stock. West Coast Marketing challenged this assessment in the United States Tax Court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Raum, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.