West v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
167 F.3d 776 (1999)
- Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD
Facts
Ronald West and his wife (plaintiffs) sued tire manufacturer Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. (Goodyear) and rim manufacturer The Budd Company (Budd) (defendants) after a tire mounted on a mismatched rim exploded, injuring West. West owned an auto-body shop but also did tire and rim work. A customer brought in two 16-inch tires that West inadvertently mounted on 16.5-inch rims. The first tire inflated smoothly without incident, and the second exploded. West retained an attorney whose investigator retained the remnants of the exploded tire and the first tire, which stayed fully inflated. Before bringing suit, West’s lawyer sent the tires to a law firm that specialized in tire-explosion cases, which photographed then deflated the first tire. After discovery began, Goodyear and Budd asked to inspect West’s shop, especially his tire-mounting machine and compressor. However, the month before the scheduled inspection, West sold both pieces of equipment. Goodyear and Budd eventually found the equipment, but it had been left outside and deteriorated. Budd moved to dismiss based on spoliation, while Goodyear moved to exclude the spoliated evidence but not for dismissal, arguing their defenses depended on the spoliated evidence showing West’s equipment malfunctioned such that he overinflated both tires. The judge dismissed the complaint entirely based on spoliation. In the interim, West died, and his wife was substituted on his behalf.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (McLaughlin, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.