Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

West Virginia Div. of Izaak Walton League of America, Inc. v. Butz

United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
522 F.2d 945 (1975)


Facts

Section 476 of the Organic Act of 1897 (Act), 16 U.S.C. § 476, authorized the secretary of agriculture to sell only the “dead, matured, or large growth of trees” in national forests, in order to promote younger forest growth. Section 476 also required timber to be marked and designated prior to being sold. The United States Forest Service (USFS) (defendant) entered into three contracts for the sale of timber in the Monongahela National Forest (Forest), which was located in West Virginia. The contracts involved the sale and cutting of trees that were not dead, physiologically mature, or large. Also, the trees were not marked prior to cutting. The West Virginia Division of the Izaak Walton League of America (plaintiff) brought an action against the USFS, challenging the timber sales and seeking declaratory and injunctive relief. The district court enjoined the USFS from contracting for or allowing tree cutting in the Forest in violation of the Act. The USFS appealed, claiming that “large growth of trees” referred to the number of trees rather than the size of the trees. The USFS also claimed that “mature” referred to (1) physiological maturity; (2) economic maturity, or the highest marketable value; and (3) management maturity, or the point at which a tree best fulfilled its purpose of supplying a product.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Field, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 174,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.