Western Energy Alliance v. Salazar
United States District Court for the District of Wyoming
2011 WL 3737520 (2011)
- Written by Robert Cane, JD
Facts
The United States Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management (bureau) (defendant) administered oil-and-gas lease sales pursuant to the Mineral Leasing Act. The Mineral Leasing Act, as amended by the Federal Onshore Oil and Gas Leasing Reform Act of 1987 (1987 reform act), provided that “leases shall be issued within the sixty days following payment by the successful bidder.” The bureau conducted a lease sale of parcels in Wyoming and Utah. The lease sale faced protests. Ultimately, the bureau proceeded with the lease sale and accepted bids for the lease parcels. Western Energy Alliance and several other energy companies (energy companies) (plaintiffs) were declared the highest qualifying bidders for a number of oil-and-gas leases in Wyoming and Utah from each state’s respective bureau offices. However, the secretary of the Department of the Interior failed to issue any of the protested leases during the 60-day period following payment by the energy companies that had bid successfully. The energy companies sued Secretary of the Interior Ken Salazar (defendant) to compel him to issue the pending leases to the energy companies. The secretary argued that the 1987 reform act’s provision providing that “leases shall be issued” simply meant that leases must be issued to the successful bidder if the secretary decides to issue the leases at all.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Freudenthal, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.