Logourl black
From our private database of 12,700+ case briefs...

Western Rock Co. v. Davis

Texas Court of Civil Appeals
432 S.W.2d 555 (1968)


Facts

Western Rock Company (defendant), a corporation, engaged in blasting operations in Jacksboro, Texas from August 1965 through May 1966. G.L. Stroud (defendant) was Western Rock’s president and supervised its operations. Stroud and his wife owned 50 percent of its stock. The other half was owned by Machine Investment Corporation (MIC), an entity owned and controlled by L.C. Fuller (defendant). Fuller was also a member of Western Rock’s board of directors. All of Western Rock’s equipment and other assets were leased from MIC. The lease was structured so that Fuller would profit if Western Rock succeeded, but if Western Rock encountered difficulty, Fuller and MIC could recover all of the company’s assets. In the early fall of 1965, Stroud began receiving complaints from Jacksboro residents who claimed the blasting had damaged their property. In November 1985, Stroud learned that Western Rock had been sued by a group of property owners (plaintiffs), and that the company’s insurance would likely not cover any damages. Despite being in daily contact with Fuller during the relevant time period, Stroud did not mention either the complaints or the lawsuit to Fuller until January 1966. At that time they decided to continue the blasting activities in spite of the financial risk. After a verdict was entered against Western Rock, Fuller assumed full control over the company. All the company’s assets were transferred back to MIC. The court also entered judgment against Stroud and Fuller personally on the grounds that Western Rock was a shell corporation that they used to conduct destructive activities. Stroud and Fuller appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Langdon, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 120,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 12,700 briefs, keyed to 172 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.