Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Lesesne

198 F.2d 154 (1952)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Lesesne

United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
198 F.2d 154 (1952)

Facts

A woman was killed in the street by a car driven by Thomas B. Lesesne, Jr. (plaintiff). The next morning, H. G. Willingham dispatched a telegram to Lesesne, threatening to expose the killing. The telegram, which was delivered by Western Union Telegraph Company (Western Union) (defendant), was opened and read by Lesesne’s wife before Lesesne saw it. The contents of the message were also seen by the Western Union employees who handled its transmission. Lesesne brought a libel action against Western Union on the grounds that legal publication of the telegram occurred when the letter was read by parties other than Lesesne. The jury question concerning publication to the Western Union employees turned on whether those employees were privileged to see a private communication between two parties. The jury delivered a verdict for Lesesne. Western Union appealed. The United States Court of Appeals granted certiorari.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Soper, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership