Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Westpac Pacific Food v. Commissioner

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
457 F.3d 970 (2006)


Facts

Westpac Pacific Food (Westpac) (plaintiff) was a purchasing syndicate comprised of three grocery-store chains. Westpac entered into discounted volume-purchase contracts with grocery suppliers. The suppliers advanced approximately $5 million annually to Westpac as a discount on Westpac’s future purchases. Whenever Westpac purchased the agreed-upon volume of inventory at full price, Westpac would keep the cash advance as a discount for the volume purchase. Whenever Westpac purchased less than the agreed-upon volume, Westpac would repay the cash-advance amount, prorated to reflect the actual volume that Westpac purchased. Westpac was an accrual-basis taxpayer. When Westpac received the cash advances, Westpac accrued the advances as a liability, as was generally accepted. Westpac offset this liability pro rata whenever Westpac purchased inventory to which the discount applied. The federal tax commissioner (defendant) sought to tax Westpac on the cash advances in the tax years the advances were received, asserting that the advances were taxable income. Westpac petitioned the United States Tax Court for a redetermination. The tax court entered judgment in favor of the commissioner. Westpac appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Kleinfield, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.