Whalen v. Ford Motor Credit Co.

475 F. Supp. 537 (1979)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Whalen v. Ford Motor Credit Co.

United States District Court for the District Court of Maryland
475 F. Supp. 537 (1979)

  • Written by Whitney Kamerzel , JD

Facts

Ford Motor Credit Co. (Ford) (defendant) signed a loan commitment to fund a 28-story condominium project owned by Towson Associates Limited Partnership, Cornelius Whalen, and Robert Whalen Co., Inc. (collectively, the borrowers) (plaintiffs). The loan commitment required the borrowers to pay $200,000 in commitment fees to Ford. The loan commitment also contained a condition precedent that required the building’s construction to be completed before the loan’s closing date. At the loan’s closing, although the project was substantially completed, Ford refused to fund the loan because the building was not 100 percent completed. The borrowers sued Ford for breach of contract. Ford moved for summary judgment and argued that the financing commitment expired at the loan’s closing date when the loan’s condition precedent was not met.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Blair, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 802,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership