Logourl black
From our private database of 12,700+ case briefs...

Whalen v. Roe

United States Supreme Court
429 U.S. 589 (1977)


Facts

In 1970, in response to a concern that legitimate drugs were being diverted into unlawful channels, the New York state legislature created a special commission to evaluate the state’s drug-control laws. The commission was tasked with producing new legislation to help the state monitor and control drug use. The commission produced a new statute that classified potentially harmful drugs into five schedules. Schedule I included highly abused drugs that had no medical use and could not be prescribed. Schedules II through V included drugs with a progressively lower potential for abuse but with recognized medical purposes. Except in emergencies, the act requires all prescriptions for Schedule II drugs to be prepared in triplicate on an official form. The form includes personal information about the recipient of the drug, including his or her name and address. A copy of the form is forwarded to and kept by the New York State Department of Health. Once received by the Department, information is logged into a private computer. Forms are locked in a vault for five years and destroyed. Roe (plaintiff) represented a group of patients regularly receiving Schedule II drugs in New York. Roe brought suit in federal district court against Whalen (defendant), Commissioner of the New York Department of Health, alleging that the New York statute was unconstitutional as a violation of a patient’s right to privacy. The district court held the statute unconstitutional, and Whalen appealed to the United States Supreme Court.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Stevens, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 119,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 12,700 briefs, keyed to 172 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.