Wheeler v. Upton-Wheeler

113 Nev. 1185 (1997)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Wheeler v. Upton-Wheeler

Nevada Supreme Court
113 Nev. 1185 (1997)

  • Written by Haley Gintis, JD

Facts

In 1993, Ruthann Upton-Wheeler (Ruthann) (plaintiff) filed for divorce from John Wheeler (John) (defendant). Ruthann requested that an unequal division of community property be granted. At trial, the judge allowed Ruthann to admit into evidence pictures of injuries that she claimed to have sustained because of John’s abuse. The judge admitted the evidence for the purpose of deciding whether an unequal division of community property was warranted. The court found that John had abused Ruthann, and the abuse served as a compelling reason to grant the unequal distribution of community property. Additionally, the court awarded John physical custody of their 16-year-old daughter along with the family’s home. However, John was required to pay Ruthann fifty percent of the house’s net equity which amounted to $18,500. The court determined that John was required to pay Ruthann $10,000 and that Ruthann would receive a credit for the remaining amount by receiving a reduction in her child-support obligation. Ruthann was not required to pay any child support once the house payment was satisfied to accomplish the unequal-distribution objective. John filed to set aside the judgment and requested a new trial. The district court denied the motion. John appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership