From our private database of 33,600+ case briefs...
Whildin v. Kovacs
Illinois Appellate Court
403 N.E.2d 694 (1980)
Landowners (plaintiffs) sued two purchasers (defendants) for slander of title after the purchasers’ offer to buy a parcel of the landowners’ real estate fell through. The landowners accepted the purchasers’ offer subject to the recission of an existing contract on the same parcel of real estate. When the existing contract had not been cancelled, the purchasers were notified, and their earnest money was returned to them. Notwithstanding that, the purchasers went ahead and recorded their real estate contract with the landowners with the recorder of deeds and filed a notice of lis pendens against the property. The landowners alleged these actions impaired the landowners’ ability to sell their property and that this constituted a slander of title. The trial court dismissed the slander-of-title claim because the trial court found that the claim did not contain an allegation of malice and that the purchasers had not acted with malice. The landowners appealed after the trial court denied the landowner’s request to file a second amended counterclaim. The landowners cited the Restatement of Torts § 625(b) and argued that the purchasers’ recorded the contract and filed the notice of lis pendens without legal justification and that was sufficient to establish malice for slander of title.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (McGillicuddy, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 602,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 602,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 33,600 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.