Whitaker v. Kenosha Unified School District No. 1. Board of Education

858 F.3d 1034 (2017)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Whitaker v. Kenosha Unified School District No. 1. Board of Education

United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
858 F.3d 1034 (2017)

  • Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD

Facts

High-school student Ashton Whitaker (Ash) identified as a transgender boy. He was diagnosed with gender dysphoria, which the American Psychiatric Association recognized as experiencing a gender opposite from that assigned at birth. School administrators said Ash could use only the girls’ or a gender-neutral office bathroom. Worried that would stigmatize him and undermine his transition, Ash developed stress-related migraines, depression, anxiety, and suicidal thoughts. During his junior year, Ash used the boys’ bathroom for nearly six months without incident until a teacher reported him. The administration told Ash that changing school records to identify him as male and allow him to use the boys’ bathroom would require proof of a surgical transition—a surgery prohibited before age 18. Security guards monitored Ash, and school officials met with him for using the boys’ room. The school gave Ash a key to two additional gender-neutral bathrooms far from the classrooms, but other students questioned him about it. Ash’s mother (plaintiff) sued the school board and its superintendent (defendants) on Ash’s behalf, claiming the school’s unwritten policy violated Title IX and equal protection. Experts testified that using the boys’ bathroom was integral to Ash’s transition and emotional health. His doctor reported that the meetings with school officials caused psychological distress that could permanently injure his well-being. The court granted preliminary injunction allowing Ash to use the boys’ room. The school board appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Williams, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 811,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership