Whitaker v. Kenosha Unified School District No. 1. Board of Education
United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
858 F.3d 1034 (2017)
- Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD
Facts
High-school student Ashton Whitaker (Ash) identified as a transgender boy. He was diagnosed with gender dysphoria, which the American Psychiatric Association recognized as experiencing a gender opposite from that assigned at birth. School administrators said Ash could use only the girls’ or a gender-neutral office bathroom. Worried that would stigmatize him and undermine his transition, Ash developed stress-related migraines, depression, anxiety, and suicidal thoughts. During his junior year, Ash used the boys’ bathroom for nearly six months without incident until a teacher reported him. The administration told Ash that changing school records to identify him as male and allow him to use the boys’ bathroom would require proof of a surgical transition—a surgery prohibited before age 18. Security guards monitored Ash, and school officials met with him for using the boys’ room. The school gave Ash a key to two additional gender-neutral bathrooms far from the classrooms, but other students questioned him about it. Ash’s mother (plaintiff) sued the school board and its superintendent (defendants) on Ash’s behalf, claiming the school’s unwritten policy violated Title IX and equal protection. Experts testified that using the boys’ bathroom was integral to Ash’s transition and emotional health. His doctor reported that the meetings with school officials caused psychological distress that could permanently injure his well-being. The court granted preliminary injunction allowing Ash to use the boys’ room. The school board appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Williams, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.