White Construction Company v. Dupont
Florida First District Court of Appeal
430 So. 2d 915 (1983)
![JL](https://quimbee-production.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads/educator/photo/176/Josh_Lee.webp)
- Written by Josh Lee, JD
Facts
Nathaniel Dupont (plaintiff), a truck owner and operator, was injured and permanently disabled in an accident involving a CAT 988 loader owned by White Construction Company (White) (defendant) and driven by an employee of Limerock Industries, Inc. (Limerock) (defendant). Mr. Dupont and his wife, Janey Dupont (plaintiff), sued White and Limerock. At trial, Mrs. Dupont testified that Mr. Dupont could no longer do household chores, but did not present evidence as to the reasonable value of his domestic labor or the cost of paying someone else to do it. The jury returned a verdict in favor of the Duponts, including an award of $1,025,000 for Mrs. Dupont for loss of her husband’s consortium. The loss-of-consortium award covered loss of financial support, loss of domestic labor, and loss of intangible factors such as companionship. The defendants appealed, arguing that the award for loss of consortium was excessive.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Ervin, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.