White Mountain Center v. County of Maricopa

241 Ariz. 230, 386 P.3d 416 (2016)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

White Mountain Center v. County of Maricopa

Arizona Court of Appeals
241 Ariz. 230, 386 P.3d 416 (2016)

Facts

The Arizona Medical Marijuana Act (AMMA) decriminalized certain medical uses of marijuana and immunized AMMA-compliant marijuana users from being penalized under state law. The AMMA also authorized the establishment of medical-marijuana dispensaries (MMDs) and empowered the Arizona Department of Health Services to establish a registration and tracking system for MMDs. White Mountain Health Center, Inc. (White Mountain) (plaintiff) applied to Maricopa County, Arizona (the county) (defendant) for zoning approval to establish an MMD pursuant to the AMMA. The county denied the application, reasoning that approving the application might subject Maricopa officials to prosecution under the federal Controlled Substances Act (CSA). White Mountain challenged the county’s decision in court and moved for summary judgment, requesting that the trial court order the county to issue the zoning authorization. The county also moved for summary judgment, arguing that federal law preempted the issuance of zoning authorization for the MMD because (1) it was impossible for county employees to comply with both the AMMA and the CSA, and (2) the AMMA created an obstacle to the federal government’s enforcement of the CSA. Both White Mountain and the county agreed that the CSA did not occupy the field of drug regulation, nor did it expressly preempt state law. The trial court found that neither impossibility preemption nor obstacle preemption applied and granted partial summary judgment to White Mountain. The county appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Kessler, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership