White v. Aronson

302 U.S. 16 (1937)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

White v. Aronson

United States Supreme Court
302 U.S. 16 (1937)

Facts

Section 609 of the Revenue Act of 1932 (the act) imposed a 10 percent excise tax on sales of specific sporting goods as well as the general category of “games and parts of games.” Viking Manufacturing Company (Viking) sold jigsaw puzzles that involved assembling cardboard pieces to create a picture. Aronson (plaintiff), trustee in bankruptcy of Viking, brought suit to recover taxes paid to a collector (defendant) under the act, arguing that the puzzles were not taxable as “games and parts of games.” The trial court found that the puzzles constituted games and were therefore subject to the excise tax. The court of appeals reversed and directed judgment for Aronson, determining that the act was intended to tax instrumentalities used in games of contest between two or more persons, but not puzzles, which the dictionary defined as problems “designed for testing ingenuity.” The court of appeals also noted that jigsaw puzzles were not taxed under previous versions of the act and that commercial trade usage differentiated between jigsaw picture puzzles and games. The United States Supreme Court accepted the case on writ of certiorari.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (McReynolds, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership