White v. Benkowski
Supreme Court of Wisconsin
37 Wis.2d 285, 155 N.W.2d 74 (1967)
- Written by Christine Hilgeman, JD
Facts
Virgil and Gwynneth White (the Whites) (plaintiffs) entered into a written contract with their neighbors, Paul and Ruth Benkowski (the Benkowskis) (defendants), in which they agreed to pay $3 per month and half of the cost of any future repairs and maintenance of the Benkowski’s well for use of water from the Benkowski’s well to supply their home. After the relationship between the Whites and Benkowskis soured, the Benkowskis periodically turned off the water to the Whites’ home for periods of less than an hour, causing inconvenience to the Whites, but no pecuniary loss. The Whites sued the Benkowskis for breach of contract. The trial court instructed the jury that only nominal damages could be awarded because the Whites had not proved pecuniary loss. The jury awarded the Whites $10 in compensatory damages and $2,000 in punitive damages, finding that the Benkowskis breached the contract maliciously. The trial court reduced the award to $1 in compensatory damages and no punitive damages. The Whites appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Wilkie, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 780,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.