Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

White v. Berenda Mesa Water District

California Court of Appeal, Fifth District
87 Cal.Rptr. 338 (1970)


Facts

The Berenda Mesa Water District (District) (defendant) requested bids for a construction project that included excavation. White (plaintiff) submitted the lowest bid and with it, filed a $42,789 surety bond issued by Aetna (plaintiff). In calculating the cost of the excavation, White studied the site and the plans and specifications issued by the District. He also had his son Kelly examine soil reports made available to the bidders. Based on Kelly’s findings, which White confirmed with the consulting engineers for the project, White estimated that the excavation would include little hard rock, which was more costly to excavate. In actuality, the excavation involved about 50 percent hard rock. White failed to realize that fact because he never compared the soil report data against the plans and specifications. Upon realizing his error, and prior to the District awarding the project, White sought to withdraw his bid and reclaim the bond. The District denied his request and formally awarded the project to White. He then rescinded the bid at which point the District awarded the project to the next lowest bidder. White and Aetna filed a claim seeking declaratory relief. The District filed a claim for damages. The trial court ruled in favor of the District, and awarded it the amount of the surety bond, on the grounds that White’s mistake was one of judgment, not of fact, thereby barring relief. White and Aetna appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Coakley, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 200,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.