Logourl black
From our private database of 14,200+ case briefs...

White v. Fletcher/Mayo/Associates

Supreme Court of Georgia
303 S.E.2d 746 (1983)


Facts

In 1973, Eldridge White (plaintiff) started working for Fletcher/Mayo/Associates, Inc. (FMA) (defendant). By 1981, White was the senior vice-president of the Atlanta office. FMA began merger negotiations with Doyle Dane in 1982. At that time, White owned 7,114 shares of FMA stock. Any FMA shareholder who voted in favor of the merger received 1.2991 Doyle Dane shares for each FMA share. White voted in favor of the merger and, following the merger, White realized $60,000 in profit. Prior to the merger, FMA and Doyle Dane had the four highest shareholders, including White, sign restrictive covenants, including a covenant not to compete. Following the merger, White was fired. White sued to determine if the covenant not to compete was enforceable. The trial court held the covenant not to compete unreasonable, but blue-penciled the covenant into a more limited form because it was ancillary to the sale of FMA to Doyle Dane. White appealed.  

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Bell, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 240,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,200 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.