White v. Town of Chapel Hill

899 F. Supp. 1428 (1995)

From our private database of 47,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

White v. Town of Chapel Hill

United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
899 F. Supp. 1428 (1995)

Facts

Chapel Hill Police Department officers (officers) (defendants) responded to a hostage situation between William White (plaintiff) and his then fiancée, Rhonda Allen. White and Allen both had a history of mental illness. Allen was outside when the officers arrived, and she told James Hugerich, the crisis-unit supervisor and a police negotiator, that she found White’s journal and that it contained suicidal and homicidal thoughts. Hugerich read White’s journal notes that said White wanted to blow people away and that he could blow out his brains. Allen told Hugerich that White was carrying a .44-caliber revolver. After nearly six hours of negotiation, police secured White and his gun. He was taken to the emergency room and involuntarily committed. White sued the Town of Chapel Hill (Chapel Hill) (defendant) and six officers, individually and in their official capacities, for defamation, among other claims. White alleged that the officers called him a gunman when talking to the press, and that this damaged his reputation within the community and was therefore actionable as slander. White alleged no other particular damages due to the officers’ allegedly defamatory statements. White argued that the word gunman used to describe him was false because he did not wield or brandish a gun. Chapel Hill and the officers moved for summary judgment, arguing that they did not defame White.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Bullock, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 899,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,000 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership