From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...
Whitlock v. Hilander Foods, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Illinois
720 N.E.2d 302 (1999)
Hilander Foods, Inc. (Hilander) (defendant) began construction of an addition to a grocery store. The addition included a retaining wall. Hilander obtained permission from the adjoining landowner, Whitlock (plaintiff), to have workers and equipment on Whitlock’s property during the construction. In September, soon after construction began, Whitlock noticed that a portion of the foundation of the retaining wall called footings extended onto his property. Whitlock immediately met with Hilander and attempted to work out a lease to allow the footings to remain. Hilander committed to negotiating a payment for the lease, and Whitlock did not insist on the removal of the footings. Construction continued, but no agreement was reached regarding the lease. Whitlock withdrew permission for the equipment and workers to be on his land in mid-October. A survey completed in November showed that the footings extended 18 inches into Whitlock’s property. Hilander claimed that previously existing footings had also encroached onto Whitlock’s land and that the new footings were in the same place as the old footings. The parties still did not reach an agreement regarding the lease, and Whitlock sued Hilander on March 11, seeking an injunction requiring that the footings be removed from his property. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of Hilander and denied the injunction. Whitlock appealed to the Court of Appeals of Illinois.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Bowman, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 217,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.