Whittier v. Kobayashi
United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
581 F.3d 1304 (2009)
- Written by Arlyn Katen, JD
Facts
Police obtained a warrant to conduct a raid of Marlene Whittier’s (plaintiff) home, based on evidence of her son, Anthony Diotaiuto’s drug activity. Officer Kobayashi (defendant) led a Special Weapons and Tactics (SWAT) team in the execution of the warrant because Diotaiuto was known to carry a handgun and store a shotgun in his bedroom closet. The parties disputed whether police knocked and announced their presence before Kobayashi and the SWAT team broke down Whittier’s door. The search culminated in a shootout between police and Diotaiuto, and police killed Diotaiuto. Whittier sued several members of the SWAT team (defendants), alleging that Kobayashi violated her son’s Fourth Amendment rights by entering her home without first knocking and announcing the SWAT team’s presence. Kobayashi moved for summary judgment, raising a qualified-immunity defense and arguing that the knock and announce had occurred. The district court denied Kobayashi’s motion for summary judgment regarding the knock-and-announce claim, and Kobayashi appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
