Whitty v. State
Supreme Court of Wisconsin
149 N.W.2d 557 (1967)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Whitty (defendant) was charged with molesting a young girl. The prosecution alleged that he lured the victim down an alley and into a basement by telling her that he needed help finding a rabbit. On cross-examination of Whitty, the prosecution alleged that Whitty had lured another girl in the same alley using the same fake rabbit story the night before. Whitty denied that he was in the alley the night before. To rebut this testimony, the prosecution called the little girl from the previous night to testify that Whitty was in fact in the alley and had lured her using a rabbit story. The trial court allowed this testimony and instructed the jury that the testimony was not to be relied upon as evidence of Whitty’s guilt, but rather only for the purpose of identification, since he had denied being in the alley the night before. Whitty was convicted and he appealed on the grounds that the testimony of the girl from the previous night should not have been admitted.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Hallows, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
