Wickard v. Filburn
United States Supreme Court
317 U.S. 111, 63 S. Ct. 82 (1942)
- Written by Megan Petersen, JD
Facts
During the Great Depression of the 1930s, President Franklin Roosevelt and the Democratic-controlled Congress passed many New Deal programs designed to improve the poor economic climate in the United States. One such program was the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1938 (the act), which limited the area that farmers could devote to wheat production in an effort to stabilize the national price of wheat. Filburn (plaintiff), a small farmer, was penalized pursuant to the act for producing wheat in excess of the act’s quotas. Filburn filed suit against Secretary of Agriculture Wickard (defendant), seeking to enjoin enforcement against himself of the penalties. Filburn argued that because the excess wheat was produced for his own private consumption and never entered the stream of commerce, his activities could not be regulated by Congress under the Commerce Clause. The district court agreed with Filburn that Congress’s regulations were unconstitutional, and the circuit court affirmed. Wickard appealed to the United States Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Jackson, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 825,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
