Wiener v. Lazard Freres & Co.

672 N.Y.S.2d 8 (1998)

From our private database of 46,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Wiener v. Lazard Freres & Co.

Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division
672 N.Y.S.2d 8 (1998)

  • Written by Joseph Bowman, JD

Facts

Wiener and others (plaintiffs) are partners in a realty company that owned an office building on which Crossland Federal Savings Bank (Crossland) held a mortgage. After defaulting, the partnership filed for bankruptcy. The plaintiffs ensured the property was transferred to Crossland in exchange for the discharge of personal guaranties. The plaintiffs contacted Lazard Freres & Co. (Lazard) (defendant) about financing a settlement offer with Crossland that would allow them to keep the building. Lazard agreed to provide $45 million in a commitment letter in exchange for a $300,000 application fee “deemed fully earned by [Lazard].” Lazard requested information about the property that the plaintiffs considered confidential and refused to disclose until after the letter was issued. Crossland refused the offer, and a Lazard executive took over negotiations for the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs claim that instead, Lazard negotiated a deal with Crossland for another company using the plaintiff’s confidential information. The plaintiffs sued Lazard for unjust enrichment and breach of fiduciary duty. Lazard moved for dismissal because (1) its defense was rooted in documentary evidence, (2) the complaint did not state a cause of action, and (3) the complaint did not adequately set out the breach of fiduciary claim. The plaintiffs amended the complaint with additional facts and an unfair competition claim. The court granted the motions to dismiss as against the amended complaint. The plaintiffs appealed to the Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Milonas, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 743,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 743,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,000 briefs, keyed to 986 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 743,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,000 briefs - keyed to 986 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership