Wilbert v. Commissioner

553 F.3d 544 (2009)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Wilbert v. Commissioner

United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
553 F.3d 544 (2009)

JC

Facts

David Wilbert (plaintiff) was an airline mechanic employed by Northwest Airlines. After September 11, 2001, Northwest began laying off many employees. Wilbert was laid off but had the right to keep his job by “bumping” a mechanic with less tenure, which meant taking the other mechanic’s job. Wilbert had been working at the Minneapolis airport and lived nearby. After being laid off, Wilbert bumped another mechanic and took a position in Chicago. However, a few days later, Wilbert was then bumped by a more senior mechanic. Wilbert then bumped a mechanic in Anchorage, Alaska. After three weeks, Wilbert was bumped again. Wilbert then worked in New York City, but again, after a week, Wilbert was bumped and had exhausted his bumping rights. Soon after that, Wilbert was hired for an interim position (not longer than nine months) in Anchorage. With all of those moves, Wilbert incurred substantial living expenses (nearly $20,000), which he would not have incurred had Wilbert remained in Minneapolis. Wilbert deducted those living expenses on his 2003 tax return as ordinary and necessary business expenses, being traveling expenses while the taxpayer was away from home, under 26 U.S.C. § 162(a). The Commissioner of Internal Revenue (the commissioner) (defendant) denied the deduction, and Wilbert eventually filed suit in the tax court. The tax court ruled for the commissioner, analyzing whether the work away from home was temporary or indefinite and then not allowing the deduction because Wilbert’s sojourns were indefinite. However, other cases had attempted to apply other standards, including a reasonableness test that attempted to analyze the taxpayer’s behavior to see if the absence from home was reasonable and a business-exigencies rule that considered only whether the business in question was a motivating factor in the travel rather than personal conveniences or necessities. Wilbert also tried to argue that he carried on a real estate business in Minneapolis, but Wilbert earned only $2,000 from this business.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Posner, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership