Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Wilcox Development Co. v. First Interstate Bank of Oregon

United States District Court for the District of Oregon
605 F. Supp. 592 (1985)


Facts

Wilcox Development Co. and other entities and individuals (collectively, plaintiffs) sued First Interstate Bank of Oregon (FIOR) and another banking institution (Banks) (collectively, defendants) in four separate actions that were consolidated for trial in a federal district court in Oregon. Plaintiffs alleged that the Banks violated the Sherman Antitrust Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1, by agreeing to set their prime interest rates at an artificial, anticompetitive level. There was no evidence of an explicit agreement by the Banks. Plaintiffs argued that an agreement could be inferred by the following combination of events: the homogeneity of prime interest rates among the Banks and other lenders; the Banks’ access to publicly available information about changes in prime rates throughout the country; and the attendance of Bank employees at conventions, which allegedly afforded them the opportunity to conspire. Trial testimony of expert witnesses for both plaintiffs and the Banks established that the prime rate was a national rate determined by national economic conditions and that a bank’s divergence from the national rate would be foolhardy and financially impracticable to maintain. FIOR presented evidence that it made decisions about its prime rate on the basis of a process not shared by other banks. A jury rendered a decision for the plaintiffs. The Banks moved for judgment as a matter of law or, in the alternative, for a new trial.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Redden, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 199,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.