WildEarth Guardians v. Salazar

783 F. Supp. 2d 61 (2011)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

WildEarth Guardians v. Salazar

United States District Court for the District of Columbia
783 F. Supp. 2d 61 (2011)

  • Written by Robert Cane, JD

Facts

WildEarth Guardians, Defenders of Wildlife, the Sierra Club (environmental groups) (plaintiffs) challenged the decision of the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) (defendant) to offer certain public lands with coal deposits for lease. The Mineral Leasing Act of 1920 (MLA) provided the secretary of the Department of the Interior (defendant) the power to lease public lands for coal mining. The MLA required only that the leases were subject to a competitive bidding process. Otherwise, the MLA authorized the secretary to promulgate regulations needed to advance the act’s objectives. The secretary enacted regulations conferring authority on the BLM (a bureau of the Department of the Interior) to manage the leasing process on public lands. The regulations provided for two types of competitive bidding, the competitive-regional-leasing process and the leasing-by-application process. The competitive-regional-leasing process applied only in areas designated as coal-production regions. The leasing-by-application process applied in all areas outside coal-production regions or if an emergency need for coal was demonstrated. The BLM established the Powder River Coal Production Region in 1979. In 1990, the BLM decertified the Powder River Basin as a coal-production region. As a result, federal-coal-lease applications for the area were subject to the leasing-by-application process rather than the competitive-regional-leasing process. Coal production increased 242 percent in the period after the Powder River Basin was decertified. In 2005, Antelope, a coal-mining company, filed an application requesting that the BLM offer certain public lands in the Powder River Basin for competitive-lease sale. In 2010, the BLM divided the land into two tracts and offered them separately for lease (West Antelope II tracts). Each tract was offered at competitive sealed-bid sales as part of the leasing-by-application process. The environmental groups challenged the BLM’s decision to offer the West Antelope II tracts for lease by application, arguing that the BLM was required first to recertify the Powder River Basin as a coal-production region.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Kollar-Kotelly, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership