WildEarth Guardians v. Zinke
United States District Court for the District of Columbia
368 F. Supp. 3d 41 (2019)
- Written by Salina Kennedy, JD
Facts
The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) (defendant) authorized 282 oil-and-gas leases on federal land in Wyoming. The environmental assessments supporting the BLM’s decision discussed climate change on a conceptual level, summarizing Wyoming’s current climate, explaining the mechanics of climate change, acknowledging that oil-and-gas drilling contribute to climate change, and predicting the impact of climate change on Wyoming’s climate. However, the environmental assessments did not quantify or forecast drilling-related greenhouse-gas emissions, nor did they evaluate the potential greenhouse-gas emissions from the downstream use of oil and gas produced on the leased parcels of land. Further, the environmental assessments did not compare the cumulative impacts of drilling on the leased parcels to state, regional, and national greenhouse-gas-emissions forecasts. Based on the environmental assessments, the BLM issued Findings of No Significant Environmental Impacts (FONSIs), concluding that the leases could be authorized without an environmental-impact statement. WildEarth Guardians (plaintiff) and Physicians for Social Responsibility (plaintiff) challenged the BLM’s authorization of the leases, arguing that the BLM had violated the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) by failing to adequately quantify the leases’ climate-change impact. The BLM argued that it was impossible to adequately predict the impact of greenhouse-gas emissions from oil-and-gas drilling at the regional level and that it was premature to require an in-depth emissions analysis at the leasing stage of the oil-and-gas development framework because it was impossible to determine whether an approved parcel would ultimately be explored or developed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Contreras, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.