Wilkin v. 1st Source Bank
Indiana Court of Appeals
548 N.E.2d 170 (1990)
- Written by David Bloom, JD
Facts
1st Source Bank (the bank) (plaintiff) was the personal representative of the estate of Olga Mestrovic. Mestrovic died having owned certain artwork created by Mestrovic’s husband. Under Mestrovic’s will, the artwork was to be sold, and the proceeds of the sale were to be distributed to members of Mestrovic’s family. Mestrovic’s estate also owned real estate, which the bank contracted to sell to Terrence G. Wilkin and Antoinette H. Wilkin (the Wilkins) (defendants). The real estate contract included selling certain personal-property items, such as appliances and curtains, but did not include artwork. After the closing, the Wilkins complained that the real estate property was cluttered with junk and needed to be cleaned out. The bank and the Wilkins agreed that the Wilkins would clean the premises, and if the Wilkins wanted to keep any of the junk items from the property, the bank would let the Wilkins do so. Neither the bank nor the Wilkins knew any artwork was on the premises. While cleaning, the Wilkins discovered and then claimed ownership of the artwork, relying on the bank’s agreement to let the Wilkins keep any personal property items on the premises. The bank petitioned the probate court to determine ownership of the artwork. The probate court ruled that the artwork belonged to the estate and ordered the Wilkins to return the artwork to the bank. The Wilkins appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Hoffman, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.