Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Wilkins v. Lasater

733 P.2d 221 (1987)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 33,600+ case briefs...

Wilkins v. Lasater

Washington Court of Appeals

733 P.2d 221 (1987)

Facts

Nell and Fred Lasater put the family farm into two testamentary trusts that effectively operated as one. The collective trust had three trustees, who were also among the trust’s beneficiaries. A majority of two trustees could make trust decisions. The trust documents stated that the trustees were supposed to farm and manage the land. However, Gary Lasater (defendant) became a trustee and wanted to lease the farm and farm it by himself. The other two trustees, Patsy Wilkins (plaintiff) and Elfred Nunn, agreed to an initial 10-year lease, with the lease-payment amounts contingent on the farm’s crop yield. At the end of the lease, Wilkins objected to renewing it, but Lasater and Nunn voted to renew it for one year. Wilkins sued to terminate the trust and to force Lasater to provide financial documents about his operations under the lease, claiming that Lasater had violated the duty of loyalty by using the trust’s property for his own benefit. Following a dispute about an advance on Wilkins’s trust distribution, the three trustees agreed that Wilkins could have an advance in exchange for extending Lasater’s lease another three years while the case proceeded in court. The court approved this agreement. At trial, Lasater testified that he had not profited from the lease, but he never provided any documents to support his claims. The trial court found that Lasater had not breached his duty of loyalty. Wilkins appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Munson, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 602,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 602,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 33,600 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 602,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 33,600 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership