Wilkinson v. Service
Illinois Supreme Court
94 N.E. 50 (1911)
- Written by Rich Walter, JD
Facts
Dr. Charles D. Hews died after executing a will that bequeathed nothing to his only child, Carrie D. Wilkinson (plaintiff). The will conveyed most of Hews' estate to his sister, Mary J. Service (defendant). Wilkinson challenged the will, claiming Hews was not of sound mind and memory when he executed the will. At trial, Hews' lawyer testified about conversations he had with Hews regarding a letter to Hews from Wilkinson’s husband, directing Hews not to communicate with Wilkinson and stating that Hews had never treated Wilkinson well. Additional evidence included Hews’ previous wills, which bequeathed only minimal amounts to Wilkinson, and a declaration that Hews had given his ex-wife, Wilkinson’s mother, property that she could give to Wilkinson. The jury ruled Hews' will was valid. Wilkinson appealed to the Supreme Court of Illinois, arguing the lawyer's testimony was inadmissible hearsay.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Carter, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
