Wille v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.
Kansas Supreme Court
549 P.2d 903 (1976)
- Written by Sarah Larkin, JD
Facts
For 13 years prior to 1974, Wille (plaintiff) had advertised his business in the yellow pages maintained by Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. (Bell) (defendant). In early 1974, a sales representative for Bell discussed with Wille the listings to be published in July of that year. Wille received a contract for those listings. On the front of the one-page contract, in two separate places, attention was directed to the terms and conditions located on the back of the contract. The terms and conditions included an exculpatory clause. The clause provided that, in the event of incorrect or missing information, Bell would not be liable for any amount beyond what was paid for the incorrect or missing listing. When the listings were published in July, Wille discovered that the listings were incorrect and much of the information was missing. Wille was not billed for and did not pay for the listings that were incorrect or entirely missing. Wille decided to advertise through alternative avenues, incurring expenses for doing so. Wille filed suit, seeking lost profits and expenses incurred for the alternative advertising. Bell moved for summary judgment due to the exculpatory clause. The trial court granted the motion. Wille appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Harman, Commissioner)
What to do next…
Here's why 778,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.