William Andrews v. United States
Inter-American Commission on Human Rights
Case 11139, Report No. 57/96, Inter-Am. Comm'n H.R., OEA/Ser.L/V/II.95 Doc. 7 rev. at 570 (1997)
- Written by Liz Nakamura, JD
Facts
William Andrews (plaintiff), a Black man, was sentenced to death in Utah. The jury for Andrews’s trial was composed entirely of white men, many of whom were members of a Mormon Church that viewed Black people as inferior to white people. During a trial recess, the jurors were found in possession of a napkin containing a drawing of a Black man hanging from the gallows and the words “hang the [racial slur].” Andrews requested a mistrial and the right to conduct an evidentiary hearing to determine which jurors saw, and were influenced by, the napkin. The trial judge refused to issue a mistrial and refused to conduct an evidentiary hearing. Instead, the judge simply admonished the jurors to ignore the napkin. Shortly before Andrews’s execution date, a petition was brought on his behalf before the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR), arguing that the United States (defendant) violated Andrews’s rights under the American Declaration to (1) life; (2) equal treatment under the law; and (3) a fair and impartial hearing. Andrews was executed two days after the IACHR petition was filed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning ()
What to do next…
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.