Williams Electronics Games, Inc. v. Garrity

366 F.3d 569 (2004)

Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
W
From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Williams Electronics Games, Inc. v. Garrity

United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
366 F.3d 569 (2004)

  • Written by Sharon Feldman, JD

Facts

Greg Barry was a buyer for Williams Electronics Games, Inc. (Williams) (plaintiff), a video-game manufacturer. Arrow Electronics, Inc. (Arrow) and Milgray Electronics, Inc. (Milgray) (defendants) supplied components to Williams. James Garrity (defendant) was a salesman for Arrow. Williams sued Garrity, Arrow, and Milgray claiming that they gave Barry more than $100,000 in cash bribes so that Williams would purchase components from them instead of other suppliers. In addition to seeking damages, Williams asked the court to impose a constructive trust on the profits Arrow and Milgray made from their bribery. The jury returned a verdict in favor of Arrow and Milgray but found against Garrity and awarded Williams $78,000—the amount of the bribe Garrity had given Barry. The judge denied Williams’s equitable claims for the imposition of a constructive trust. On appeal, Williams maintained that the court erred in instructing the jury on Arrow and Milgray’s defenses. Arrow and Milgray argued that if the court reversed the judgment for them, damages should be no greater than the amount of the $78,000 jury award against Garrity.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Posner, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 821,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 821,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 821,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 989 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Torts

Key Terms