Williams v. Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia

477 F.3d 1282 (2007)

From our private database of 46,200+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Williams v. Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia

United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
477 F.3d 1282 (2007)

Facts

Williams (plaintiff) was a female student at the University of Georgia (UGA) (defendant). Williams was sexually assaulted by three student athletes inside a dormitory. One perpetrator, Cole, a basketball player, instigated the assault by inviting Williams to his dormitory room and then encouraging two other athletes to assault her. Williams filed a complaint with the UGA police and withdrew from UGA. The three athletes were charged with disorderly conduct under the UGA Code of Conduct. Approximately one year after the incident, a UGA disciplinary panel held a hearing and decided not to sanction any of the three athletes. Cole had been involved in other disciplinary and criminal incidents prior to his assault on Williams. Prior to enrolling at UGA, Cole had been dismissed from two other colleges following allegations that he had sexually assaulted or harassed women and had been involved in several other violent incidents. Harrick, the UGA head basketball coach, Dooley, the director of the University of Georgia Athletic Association (UGAA) (defendant), and Adams, the President of UGA and UGAA, knew of the prior incidents when they recruited Cole to play basketball at UGA. Williams filed a lawsuit against UGA and UGAA, alleging a violation of Title IX. Williams alleged that not only did UGA officials know of Cole’s past sexual misconduct when recruiting and admitting him to UGA, they had also received suggestions from other student athletes that coaches needed to inform their athletes about UGA’s sexual-harassment policy. The district court granted UGA’s motion to dismiss Williams’s complaint, and she appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Kravitch, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 777,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 777,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 777,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,200 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership