Williams v. Commissioner
United States Tax Court
28 T.C. 1000 (1957)
Jay A. Williams (plaintiff) conducted a business in which he located parcels of timberland for prospective buyers. In 1951, Williams located parcels for a client, J.M. Housley, who was unable to pay at the time he received the information. Housley acknowledged his debt to Williams by issuing Williams an unsecured, non-interest-bearing promissory note for $7,166.60. Williams understood that Housley would be unable to honor the note until Housley purchased timber property and began making a profit from it. After receiving the note, Williams attempted about 10 to 15 times to sell it, but had no success. In 1954, Housley discharged the debt by paying Williams $6,666.66. Williams reported this amount in 1954. The Commissioner (defendant) determined that Williams should have reported the value of the note as income in 1951.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 166,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.